Pot petitioners call current law a 'miserable failure'

  • Discuss Comment, Blog about
  • Print Friendly and PDF

The head of the committee calling for legalization of marijuana in Nevada says the group does not support use of the drug, but rather believes the current prohibition is bad policy and "a miserable failure."

Neal Levine, of the Committee to Regulate and Control Marijuana, said instead of banning pot, the proposed statute on the 2006 ballot would set up a system of manufacture and sales for small amounts of marijuana in Nevada.

It would allow possession and use of 1 ounce or less of marijuana by adults in their own homes - while doubling the penalties for selling to minors and prohibit use by those under age 21. It would also provide for creation and licensing of retail stores to sell small amounts of pot and tax those sales. Half the revenue would go to the state treasury and the other half to drug and alcohol programs.

The goal, Levine said, is to "pull marijuana out of the criminal market, where we're financing the activities of violent gangs and drug dealers and put it into a tightly regulated market where we can have some controls and not penalize adults for something that doesn't harm another person or property."

Levine said 770,000 people were arrested in the United States on marijuana offenses - the vast majority for possession. He said federal surveys show 57.5 percent of high school seniors in Nevada admit they've smoked marijuana, and more than a quarter of those admit to habitual pot use.

"Current marijuana laws just don't work," he said. "If the goal of prohibition was to eradicate marijuana use and the marijuana supply, you'd be hard pressed to find another policy that's more of a miserable failure."

He emphasized that the committee and its parent organization the Marijuana Policy Project don't advocate marijuana use. He said they want to break the chain of criminal providers and take drug profits away from them.

"And we're not saying pass this initiative so we take marijuana out of the hands of teenagers," he said.

"What we're saying is, current laws don't work so let's pull marijuana out of the criminal market."

Levine rejected the often-repeated law enforcement theory that marijuana is a "gateway drug" that leads to use of hard drugs, including methamphetamine, cocaine and heroin. He said a 1999 National Institute of Health study found no correlation evidence marijuana is a gateway drug.

"If that were true, we'd have 100 million hard-drug addicts in the country because almost 50 percent of the people in America have tried marijuana.

The ballot question asking voters to change the law to legalize possession of 1 ounce or less of pot and to set up a system of regulated stores to tax and sell it is already on the ballot, qualified by petition more than a year ago.

Levine said organizers are depending on a volunteer-based, grass-roots campaign, knocking on doors and calling people to get out the vote.

"What we're saying is, we have a bad policy. Let's replace it with good policy," he said.

-- Contact reporter Geoff Dornan at gdornan@nevadaappeal.com or 687-8750.

Election 2006

The ballot question to change the law to legalize possession of 1 ounce or less of marijuana and set up a system of regulated stores to tax and sell it is on the 2006 ballot. It qualified by petition more than a year ago.

What would it mean?

Passage by voters of the measure to legalize marijuana would:

• set up a system of manufacture and sales for small amounts of marijuana;

• allow possession and use of 1 ounce or less of marijuana by adults in their own homes;

• double the penalties for selling to minors;

• prohibit use by those under age 21;

• provide for creation and licensing of retail stores to sell small amounts of marijuana and tax those sales.

• Half the revenue would go to the state treasury and half to drug and alcohol programs

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment