GOP Civil War breaking out, heating up

  • Discuss Comment, Blog about
  • Print Friendly and PDF

The intra-party fight between fiscal conservatives and squishy moderates in the GOP has been in full view for the past two weeks.

When House Republicans voted unanimously against the "Porkulus" bill " not once, but twice " Republican activists nationwide stood up and cheered. It gave them hope that maybe; just maybe, congressional Republicans had learned their lesson and were returning to their fiscal conservative roots.

And then, like Lucy yanking the football away from Charlie Brown, moderate Republican Sens. Arlen Specter, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe sold out their colleagues, voted for "Porkulus," and gave the Democrats the "bipartisan" cover they so desperately desired.

This didn't surprise many grassroots activists who have seen this play before, but it did anger them. Big time. But the thing that ticked them off even more is the fact that these three RINOs (Republicans in Name Only) appear to have gotten away with it (again) without any penalty or sanction by the Republican Party. After all, actions are supposed to have consequences, right?

Like next door in California.

Moderate Republican Gov. Arnold "The Taxinator" Schwarzenegger wants to raise taxes, but he can't do it without at least three Republican votes in the state Senate. This week Republican Senate Minority Leader Dave Cogdill and one other Republican caved in and supported a "compromise" (capitulation) plan that includes huge tax hikes. Fortunately, every other Republican hold their ground.

For his betrayal, reports John Fund of Political Diary, Cogdill's Senate colleagues "unceremoniously dumped" him as minority leader "and replaced him with Sen. Dennis Hollingsworth, a fierce opponent of higher taxes."

Now that's what we're talking about! Bad behavior should be penalized, not rewarded or overlooked. Otherwise bad Republicans will just keep acting like bad Republicans.

A similar situation likely will confront Nevada Republicans next week. Democrats cannot pass a proposed tax increase being peddled by their teachers union allies without at least two Republican votes in the Senate. And the betting is that moderate Senate Minority Leader Bill Raggio " who was endorsed by the union in his primary against a conservative Republican challenger last summer " will be one of those two Republicans.

Make no mistake: If Sen. Raggio caves, most of his GOP colleagues likely will buckle as well to give the boss cover. But if Sen. Raggio finds his inner Republican and rejects this tax grab, so will every other member of his caucus, thus killing it. It's that simple.

The unfunny funny thing about this is that Raggio has taken to calling Republicans who won't capitulate on tax-and-spending issues "extremists," while holding himself out as the one true Republican. Which means 221 out of 224 Republicans in the U.S. Congress, and all but two Republicans in the California Legislature, are "extremists."

Why do I get the feeling that it's Sen. Raggio who's out of step with his party, not the "extremists?"

In addition, despite the fact that not a single Republican vote is needed to pass the union's tax hike in the Assembly " just as no Republican votes were needed to pass "Porkulus" in the House of Representatives " a handful of moderate Republicans are desperately trying to rationalize a "yes" vote, which would give Democrats the illusion of "bipartisan" support and once again take the tax issue away from GOP candidates in 2010.

That some Nevada Republicans are going to sell out their party next week is, sadly, a foregone conclusion. The question is whether they'll have to pay a political price for "pulling a Specter."

They should. Every Republican who votes for this teachers union tax hike should earn a serious primary challenge next year " because the GOP can't go after tax-and-spend Democrats until they get their own house in order first.

- Chuck Muth is president of Citizen Outreach, a non-profit public policy grassroots advocacy organization.

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment