NCAA: Michigan football out of compliance

  • Discuss Comment, Blog about
  • Print Friendly and PDF

ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) - The NCAA is accusing Michigan of five potentially major rules violations under coach Rich Rodriguez, who admitted making "mistakes" but will be back for a third try at putting the Wolverines back into the national title hunt.

Incoming athletic director David Brandon disclosed the NCAA conclusions Tuesday, but said there were no surprises in the report. He expressed full support for his coach, who is 8-16 in two disappointing seasons heading the nation's winningest football program.

"Rich Rodriguez is our football coach, and he will be our football coach next year," Brandon said.

In its notice of allegations - which Michigan received Monday - the NCAA said Rodriguez "failed to promote an atmosphere of compliance within the football program," and tracked neither what his staff was doing nor whether his players were following NCAA rules, particularly those limiting the time spent on practice and football-related activities.

It also said the athletics department failed to make sure its football program was complying with NCAA regulations.

Brandon said the department "clearly made mistakes," but "there was no charge of loss of institutional control" - an allegation that in previous cases has led to severe NCAA sanctions for other schools.

An accompanying letter from the NCAA to university President Mary Sue Coleman said Michigan "should understand that all of the alleged violations set forth in the document" are considered to be "potential major violations of NCAA legislation, unless designated as secondary."

"I'm not sure I understand the difference between 'major' and 'minor' and 'secondary' and 'primary,"' Brandon said. "They spell it out very specifically in their own language."

Another potentially significant problem for Michigan is that it could be subject to the NCAA's "repeat violator rule," because of NCAA sanctions imposed in 2003 because of wrongdoing within the basketball program.

The NCAA considers the charges outlined in this week's notice as being "potential" violations until Michigan formally responds and is subject to the August hearing.

"We will make all necessary changes," Coleman said. "What we will not do is make excuses."

Michigan has 90 days to respond and will appear at an NCAA hearing on infractions in August. Michigan is seeing how its internal investigation matches up with the NCAA findings and will consider implementing self-imposed sanctions.

The NCAA said last October that it was looking into the program following an August report in the Detroit Free Press. The newspaper, citing anonymous football players, reported that Michigan exceeded NCAA limits regarding practices and workouts in 2008 and 2009.

Rodriguez, who signed a six-year deal worth $2.5 million per season, tearfully defended his program just five days before the season-opener, saying he and his staff have followed the rules. He suggested the complaints were an attempt to "tear up" his rebuilding effort following a 3-9 season.

On Tuesday, the coach said if the football staff misinterpreted NCAA rules, "That's on us."

"We're looking at it to see why we misinterpreted and why we made mistakes," he said.

NCAA regulations allow players to spend eight hours a week on mandatory workouts during the offseason. Players told the Free Press they spent two to three times that amount on required workouts, though the NCAA report released Tuesday said players more often exceeded the limit by two hours per week in most cases.

The players also said the amount of time they spent on football activities during the season exceeded the weekly limit of 20 hours and often exceeded the daily limit of four hours. They said football staff often watched offseason scrimmages that are supposed to be voluntary.

Near the end of last season, the school released embarrassing details of an internal audit that discovered Rodriguez's team failed to file forms tracking how much time players spent on football during his first season and the following offseason.

The audit noted "a concern" that the football program failed to file monthly forms created by the school to comply with NCAA rules by tracking how much players work out and practice.

The school report did not find issues of noncompliance - a key issue for NCAA investigators - but acknowledged the practice logs for football were not available to be reviewed when the audit was conducted. The forms since had been turned in on a timely basis, according to the school.

"My reading of the situation is we had a breakdown of communication," Brandon said Tuesday. "We found we were not being vigilant in the way those (time records) were being filled and managed."

The time record system that the football staff designed "was too cumbersome to manage" and is being changed.

The decision to hold the infractions hearing in August represents the latest in a series of poorly timed events for Rodriguez and his fledgling program.

First, the initial Free Press report surfaced when the Wolverines were on the verge of starting the 2009 regular season. Then, the findings of the audit, which was completed months earlier, came out during Ohio State week in November. And word of a closed-door University of Michigan Board of Regents meeting about the NCAA investigation leaked out earlier this month on the day Rodriguez announced his incoming class of recruits.

Now, the NCAA infractions hearing in August will come when the Wolverines are getting set to kick of their new season and refurbished stadium.

Brandon, who takes over as athletic director on March 8, called Tuesday "a tough day" and said the Ann Arbor school was taking "full responsibility for those events that brought us to this point."

"We will dedicate ourselves to learning from this and doing everything we can to prevent it from happening again in the future," said Brandon, the outgoing chairman and CEO of Domino's Pizza.

According to his contract, Rodriguez can be fired for cause if the NCAA, the Big Ten or the school determines he has committed a major violation of NCAA rules or he has intentionally committed any other type of violation of NCAA rules.

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment